Calvin Harris to spend 25 years in prison


Article Tools
Font size: [A] [A] [A]
Sign Up newsletter

Photo: N/A, License: N/A

Pool Photo / Press & Sun Bulletin Calvin Harris receives instruction by his attorney William Easton after the sentence is handed down. Also pictured, far left, is Defense Attorney Terrence Kindlon.

OWEGO, N.Y. - The Tioga County Courthouse was filled on Monday as Judge James T. Hayden handed down a sentence of 25 years to life to Calvin Harris for the death and disappearance of his wife, Michele Harris, in September of 2001.

This sentence was the maximum sentence for Calvin Harris' conviction of second degree murder, with the minimum sentence being 15 years to life.

Standing next to his attorneys in front of the judge, 48-year old Calvin Harris said that there were no words to describe how he was feeling. "The fact that this has gotten this far is beyond belief," Calvin Harris said of his claims of innocence and the prosecution's fight to find him guilty.

"I've said from the beginning that I'm innocent, and I can tell you I didn't do this," Calvin Harris continued. "They obviously think I have the ability to make people just disappear," said Calvin Harris. "I didn't run, I didn't hide, I have done nothing wrong and I have nothing to be ashamed of," Calvin Harris continued with conviction.

And then with a bit of tears, Calvin Harris said that he will fight this every step of the way, and if this were tried in another county he would have been found innocent. He also said that his children deserve better and that he will get his family back together again.

But this statement didn't persuade Judge James T. Hayden as he proceeded to hand down the maximum sentence for second degree murder, 25 years to life.

Hayden based his sentence on three factors - the fact that the defendant took a life, deprived his children of their mother and disposed of Michele's remains in such a way that they would never be found.

With some emotion, Hayden said that after observing that there has been an enormous gut-wrenching heartache around this case, that the court is careful not to allow emotions to govern sentencing. "One can never truly trust emotions as assuring principle," said Hayden as he prepared to hand down his sentence.

He also added that Michele Harris was subjected to the worst form of violence, and was subjected to such violence in his home. "This sentence must dissuade others in the community who are contemplating killing."

District Attorney Gerald Keene, following the sentencing, stated that he disagreed with Calvin Harris' statement that the outcome would have been different if he were tried in a different county.

"We had good, strong circumstantial evidence of guilt and I think he would have been convicted regardless of where he was tried," said Keene. "I think the defendant got a fair trial and a fair shake."

The defense attorneys appeared frustrated during the sentencing, and commented after the proceeding that they were going to file an appeal immediately.

"We got directed to file an appeal and we're going to do it today," said Defense Attorney William Easton out of Rochester, N.Y. "We're going to attack it right away and will be filing a notice of appeal right now."

The defense lawyers have stated continually, throughout the series of trials, that someone else was responsible for Michele Harris' disappearance, and that the investigation failed to look at evidence that was directing elsewhere.

One argument involves a letter from a man, John Steele, that claimed to have seen Michele Harris hours after prosecutors alleged she was killed. The letter was not allowed into evidence at the Harris trial.

Hayden on Monday denied the recent request from the attorneys to have the verdict dismissed based on the inadmission of the Steele statement. Because the prosecuting attorney responded to the recent motion from the attorneys regarding this inadmission and submitted an affidavit in which Steele's son challenged John Steele's credibility, Hayden said that the witness would have had to be cross-examined. Because Steele died, the cross-examination would not be possible.

"Cross-examination is an essential and fundamental part of our trial process," said Hayden. "The son raised issues that would be appropriate for cross-examination of Steele if he were to testify," he added. "The ability to cross-examine the witness about his son's affidavit would be lost and the jury would be left to speculate."

Hayden also addressed the motion by defense attorneys that requested the verdict dismissed based on the decision by Judge Hayden to not sequester the jury during deliberations. To this request, Hayden only noted that the court finds nothing to reverse that. Based on these judicial decisions, the motion filed prior to sentencing by the defense attorneys was also denied.

Family and friends of both Calvin Harris and Michele Harris were in Tioga County Court for the sentencing Monday, and some spoke out.

"There's no body, there's no evidence, there's no witness," said Dwight Harris, Calvin Harris' father, to media that was waiting outside the courtroom. "It's ridiculous," he added.

Merry Harris, Calvin Harris' Aunt, said, "This is typical Tioga County," as she departed the courthouse.

Jackie Casella, whose son was coached by Calvin Harris, cried when the sentence was read. "If it were my sister I would have felt good about the sentence," said Casella. "But we know him and his kids ....it's a tremendous loss for them."

Greg Taylor, Michele Harris' brother, felt good about the sentence, but noted to the media that it won't bring Michele Harris back.

Family of both Calvin Harris and Michele Harris have endured eight years of speculation, two trials, two convictions, and now one sentence.

For now, Calvin Harris will serve 25 years to life in prison, and it will be up to the State Appellate Court to decide if Harris will get another chance in court.







Type in the characters you see in the picture below. If you have trouble reading the characters in the picture, click it to see a new one.



11 posted comments

I don't know the guy or anything, but I can't believe he got convicted on such scant evidence (or lack thereof).

I think however he acted he was going to come across as suspicious. Another thing, nobody really knows who committed the crime (beyond a reasonable doubt), but they all seem so sure. Its so frustrating watching the crime and investigation channel sometimes.

whatever 06/14/10 10:24
dont know him, but judged by twelve. not once but twice...that speaks volumes, they heard the evidence not you or I. has nothing to do with anything G. Bush did. look at Jeff Dahmer - he ate the evidence.
duh 06/03/10 8:46
Scott and Bob: You both show common misconception about the writ of habeas corpus. The Constitution specifically refers to it in the Suspension Clause, Article 1, Section 9: The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it.

Habeas Corpus “(We command) that you have the body”)is a writ, or legal action, through which a person can seek relief from unlawful detention, or the relief of another person. It gives a person the right to appeal detention by the government, saying that there must be lawful justification for such detention and due process must apply. It is called "The Great Writ" for that very reason.

Sorry to disappoint you Scott, but Bush was not the first to modify or suspend this writ. President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in Maryland and parts of Midwestern states during the Civil War. President Grant suspended the writ in South Carolina in the early 1870's due to actions of the Klu Klux Klan.

In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled in Ex parte Quirin that unlawful combatant saboteurs could be denied habeas corpus and tried by military commission, making a distinction between lawful and unlawful combatants. The writ was suspended in Hawaii during World War II, pursuant to a section of the Hawaiian Organic Act, when martial law was declared in Hawaii in the aftermath of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The 1950 case Johnson v. Eisentrager denied access to habeas corpus for nonresident aliens captured and imprisoned abroad in a US-administered foreign court.

President Clinton, in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City Bombing, signed the "Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996" (AEDPA) which placed limitations on the exercise of the writ. President Bush, through a Presidential Military Order, also sought to place limitations on the writ for enemy combatants. This has been the subject of much litigation.

As to Calvin Harris, the state is NOT required to produce a body to show that a murder was committed. The State needs to show, to the satisfaction of a jury, through physical evidence, circumstantial evidence or a combination thereof that the accused, beyond a reasonable doubt, committed such an act.

In this case Mr. Harris certainly had sufficient due process to counter the State's accusation. The jury nonetheless found him guilty. You may not like the verdict but the system worked as it was designed.

RetiredPO 06/01/10 11:39
I am not saying this man in guilty or innocent but I watched this show last night and feel like something is missing.

And, this is just a thought that went thru my mind. But...his wife was working at a shady place for a well to do mom, he complained of missing money and then alot of jewlery was missing. Anyone think maybe she ran away? Im not saying she did, just one thought that went thru my head.....

SM 06/01/10 10:53
I only know what I hear, what I heard in evidence did not prove to me that he killed her. What I hear from others is that he was a jerk and that his peers tried and convicted him based soley on that. The only possible outcomes that will really clear the air is that he finally admits it or someone else comes forward and takes responsibilty.
Greg 06/01/10 10:33
Finally, justice is served!!! All, his money didn't count on this one!!!
aec 11/19/09 10:04
Bob, While it was circumstantial, without a body - I think her blood all over the place and him without an explanation was the factor that sealed it. And don't forget, we no longer have constitutional protection under the right of Habeas Corpus (literally, show me the body), as that right went out under President Bush the younger.
Scott 10/09/09 8:12
whats the evidence that he killed her? nothing there, i dont know him or care about him,i care whats going on in this country,when the law can do anything they want,that need to stop.whats next? everyone is suppose to have a fair trial....
bob 10/06/09 7:31
It work for O.J., but not for Harris!
jpb 10/06/09 5:10
For her family there can be no peace, but at last, there is a bit of justice.
Sue A 10/06/09 4:31
All his money bought him a lot of time. You or I would have been convicted the first time. I think in his sick mind he really believes that he is so privledged he should be able to get away with murder.
HappyCathy 10/06/09 9:19