mobile site Go to The Daily Review mobile

DEP fines Chesapeake Appalachia, Schlumberger for acid spill in Asylum Twp.


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

The Department of Environmental Protection has fined Chesapeake Appalachia LLC and Schlumberger Technology Corp. $15,557 each for a 295-gallon hydrochloric acid spill at Chesapeake's Chancellor natural gas well site in Asylum Township, according to a press release issued by the environmental agency on Monday.

"Fortunately, this hazardous waste spill was promptly reported, which proved critical in limiting the environmental damage," said DEP Northcentral Regional Director Robert Yowell.

Chesapeake staff notified the DEP on Feb. 9 that a 21,000-gallon tank containing 36 percent hydrochloric acid was leaking, the press release said. The acid was used for hydraulic fracturing, the release said.

When a DEP inspector arrived at the site, it was determined that the tank had two leaks and was losing about 7.5 gallons per hour of hydrochloric acid, the DEP said.

Chesapeake's emergency contractor arrived that evening and removed free-standing acid from the ground with absorbent pads; excavated trenches to contain the acid; neutralized acid-contaminated soil with soda ash and hydrated lime; and transferred about 11,000 gallons of acid from the leaking tank to two temporary tanks, the DEP said.

About 126 tons of contaminated soil had to be excavated, and more than 13,800 gallons of a hydrochloric acid and water mixture were removed from the well site, the press release said.

The leak did not contaminate ground water, said DEP spokesman Dan Spadoni.

"The fluid went onto the ground at the site, where it was contained, neutralized and removed with no permanent environmental damage," said Brian Grove, director of corporate development for Chesapeake Energy Corp., the parent company of Chesapeake Appalachia.

Chesapeake Energy staff, who discovered the leak, took immediate steps to begin cleanup of the spill, Grove said.

"We have reviewed the circumstances of this event in great detail and as a result, we have implemented new ... procedures including the use of secondary containment mechanisms to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future," Grove said.

Schlumberger issued a written statement about the incident, which says that the leak involved fluids that are "commonly used in oilfield operations."

"The fluids (that leaked) did not come into contact with any water sources in the area," Schlumberger said in the statement. "Schlumberger conducted a full investigation into the cause of the incident so that the repetition of such an incident can be avoided. Schlumberger and Chesapeake have worked cooperatively to modify operational procedures that enhance communications to achieve greater fluid handling and containment controls. This includes implementing a process that ensures containment is around all tank and equipment that is under the control and responsibility of Schlumberger."

The fines were paid to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the DEP said.

The entrance to the well is located on state Route 2024, about 300 yards east of the intersection of state routes 2024 and 2017, said Asylum Township Supervisor Kevin Barrett.

Schlumberger, which is based in Sugar Land, Texas, is a service company for the natural gas industry, Spadoni said.

Chesapeake, which holds the DEP permit for the well, had contracted with Schlumberger to provide services for the development of gas wells, including the hydraulic fracturing of this particular well, Spadoni said.

Chesapeake Appalachia LLC is a natural gas exploration company located in Charleston, W. Va.

James Loewenstein can be reached at (570) 265-1633; or e-mail: jloewenstein@thedailyreview.com.







Type in the characters you see in the picture below. If you have trouble reading the characters in the picture, click it to see a new one.



11 posted comments

Fred . . . look under your kitchen sink and read the labels most likely available there. The poison is always in the dose.
On Balance 12/09/09 1:41
Well Ethel, I suppose it is a case of whose ox is getting gored. Somehow I think if that had happened on your property or contaminated your drinking water you would be up in arms

I am disturbed by Chesapeake's campaign to make fracking solution look as harmless as regular water. They are not being entirely honest with the public. I'm not against drilling if the required safety procedures are being adherred to. But this makes me question whether Chesapeake is really interested in those procedures or running a PR campaign to maximize thier profit. Also the relation between the Review and the drilling companies seems a bit cozy.

ThomasPaine 12/09/09 10:03
I recall a spokesperson for Chesapeake recently stating that there was no danger in the fluids that they use. INCREDIBLE!
Fred Bishop 12/08/09 2:59
Nice to find out about the incident 10 months after it happened. Glad we found out about it at all, actually.
No fan of drilling 12/08/09 2:26
The really sad thing is how many of these 'spills' go un-reported?? I don't care what they say you can bet it's happening more then anyone knows!! I am SOOO glad i moved out of Bradford County and the Northeast because now it is going from worse to worst!! I came through there a couple months ago and was shocked at how much the natural beauty of the County is now gone!! All at the cost of greed.. it's very, very sad!!
Gone 12/08/09 10:43
It seems that both Chesapeake and Schlumberger responded with good leadership to the spill to contain damages and now are implementing a more proactive approach for future projects with the use of secondary containment. Kudos to them both.
Brian Campbell
Bristar Containment Industries Ltd
Bristar Containment 12/08/09 8:55
Accidents happen - SO WHAT - this is NOT news.
Ethel 12/08/09 8:35
I am comforted to know that the spill was fully disclosed to the DEP while also being contained properly at the well site, preventing contamination. However, it is not comforting to know that the hydrochloric acid was used in the hydro-fracturing process.

Every press release (AND full page advertisement from Chesapeake)I have read in the last 12 months from each gas company attempted to make it VERY CLEAR to me that the hydro-fracturing fluid was 99.5% water and silica, which doesn't sound that alarming. Makes it sound safe, like something that I shouldn't worry about.

Now they've spilled 300 gallons of acid used in the stuff (which honestly doesn't sound that bad considering the scale of the industry), and its worthy of $30,000 in total fines. Even if the numbers are correct and the hydrochloric acid is only a part of the remaining 0.50% of the total hydro-fracturing liquid, shouldn't that have been fully disclosed to the residents?

Not a huge issue for me, but I mean come on, if you've got acid in the fracking liquid that if spilled is going to cost you $30,000 maybe telling us "Hey, this stuff really IS 99.5% water and silica, with a little bit of hydrochloric acid." That would sound much better rather than spending a ton of money in advertising trying to make the stuff sound as innocent and harmless as you can.

Bill 12/08/09 8:33
We heard the sirens go off while we were out hunting; now we know what that noise will be in the future...which we hope we never hear again. (Standing Stone)
J&S 12/08/09 8:07
The fines imposed on Chesapeake and Schlumberger are laughable. If my math is correct, these fines equate to $52.74 per gallon of hydrochloric acid spilled from each company. According to today's article, the spill occurred on February 9th and it's now December that the information is made available to the public. Let's hope this is not a start of serious problems to come like the residents from Dimock Township face with Cabot Oil & Gas.

From Wikipedia: Concentrated hydrochloric acid (fuming hydrochloric acid) forms acidic mists. Both the mist and the solution have a corrosive effect on human tissue, with the potential to damage respiratory organs, eyes, skin, and intestines.

Asylum Twp Resident 12/08/09 8:06
This article is misleading.
First of all, this was a large tank that had likely been leaking for days, so it wasn't exactly reported "promptly". Second, why did it take 10 months for a major incident like this to be published in a newspaper just a few miles down the road? I mentioned this spill in several of my comments since the time of the incident, yet only now does it get reported? Makes me wonder if there's a little favoritism towards the "sponsor" company.
BCTaxpayer 12/08/09 5:53

POLL

Are you in favor of the Postal Service's plans to discontinue Saturday mail delivery?

Show results

Volunteer Pay

Support your community newspaper by making a voluntary donation to assist our Internet efforts.

Coupons

Now on thedailyreview.com, print coupons and SAVE!

m.thedailyreview.com

Now you can access thedailyreview.com on your favorite mobile device.

King Features

Get your daily dose of Comics, Horoscopes and Puzzles from thedailyreview.com

NIE MAJOR SPONSOR

Thanks to Chesapeake Energy for helping to develop our future readers, writers and thinkers by providing newspapers for area classrooms through The Review's Newspaper in Education Program.

Thank you

to our Associate Sponsors for supporting the NIE program.

USA Weekend

USA Weekend Weekly teachers guides, special reports and much more.

Showcase of Fine Homes

Search and find your new home in The Daily Review's weekly advertising supplement, Showcase of Fine Homes.

Fatality occurs at gas drilling rig

TOWANDA TWP. - An worker at an area gas drilling rig was reported killed on the job on Thursday evening. Greg Allen Henry, 31, of Athens, Tenn., fell from a height of about 20 feet off a natural gas drilling rig owned by Nomac Drilling Inc., according to


 

Fatality occurs at gas drilling rig

TOWANDA TWP. - An worker at an area gas drilling rig was reported killed on the job on Thursday evening. Greg Allen Henry, 31, of Athens, Tenn., fell from a height of about 20 feet off a natural gas drilling rig owned by Nomac Drilling Inc., according to