mobile site Go to The Daily Review mobile

Letter to the Editor 11/17


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

Congressman Carney doesn't get it

EDITOR: A few weeks ago, I called Congressman Carney's Scranton office and asked if Congressman Carney could find out why Democrats were so opposed to limiting lawsuits, known as tort reform, in any health care reform legislation. I explained this might be one way to reduce the cost of health care and that most people favored some limits. A couple of days later, I received a three page e-mail from Congressman Carney explaining the need for health care reform, etc. There was not one word about tort reform legislation.

I then called his Washington Office and asked why the congressman could not answer one simple question with one simple answer. There was a rather long pause and finally the young man I spoke with stated he knew tort reform was not in the House bill and he thought the answer would be that it would not reduce the cost of health care. I told the young man to inform Congressman Carney that if he voted for the health plan in the House and it did not include something relating to limiting lawsuits, I could not in good faith in the future vote for him.

A week ago, on one of the Sunday morning shows, the health care bill was mentioned and the statement was made that nothing was included about tort legislation except to punish individual states if states attempted to limit lawsuits on their own. I immediately e-mailed Congressman Carney and told him that if he voted for this legislation, I would never vote for him again.

If you believe there should be limits as to what people can sue for and if you believe these limits might reduce the cost of health care, your beliefs are not the same as Congressman Carney's.

Fred Hunt

Standing Stone







Type in the characters you see in the picture below. If you have trouble reading the characters in the picture, click it to see a new one.



8 posted comments

part of the problem is that doctors don't turn in doctors.
It is rare that a bad doctor gets canned. Part of the problem is that supposedly about 60% OF THE DOCTORS GET OFF ON DRUGS.
iF YOU MADE THEM TAKE A DRUG TEST ONCE A WEEK YOU WOULD SOON FIND OUT
WHO IS WHO.. BUT THAT WOULD BE TOO EASY..the main function of too many doctors is to see how many people they can get on high blood pressure medicine and Cholesteral lowering drugs.
Just follow the money.. Yes we are about to get health care by gun point..
joe dupont 11/22/09 10:41
According to a report by Catherin Arnst in Business Week, tort reform will have little effect on the overall cost of health care.
Approximately, 100,000 people suffer from medical errors each year.
Of that number, less than 4% sue the physicians. Of that 4%, only about 1 in 5 cases results in awards being given. Altho, physicians claim they have to practice defensive medicine as a means to avoid lawsuits, in actuality, they may be driven by the profit motive. The more tests done, the more income that results.
Medical malpractice lawsuits represent about 2% of the 2.5 trillion dollars spent on health care annually. Tort reform will have little impact on that.
Physicians do pay outrageous premiums for malpractice, especially those in high risk specialties, such as neurology, ob-gyn etc. However, again, it appears the premiums are exorbitant in light of the risk. Which suggests that the insurance industry has, once again, found a means to line their pockets without justification.
Perhaps, physicians should ban together to force reform within the insurance industry.
Sue A 11/18/09 8:45
Indeed the idea of very stupid people awarding other stupid people money is an exaggeration. Some foolish lawsuits are brought, but a a rule do not see the light of day, as they are dismissed. The outlandish ones we hear of are not against physicians, but corportations, i.e. the woman who spilled hot coffee on herself after purchasing it at MacDonalds." Ultimately, the courts tossed most of the award. Citing personal responsibility.
Large, often merit based awards, against physicians come when a child is harmed or when the injury is beyond the pale. Such as amputating the wrong limb, removing the wrong lung, etc.
Tort reform will not benefit attorneys, who often take half or more of the final award. It won't benefit litigants because of the fees they pay lawyers, often based on a percentage of the final award, plus fees. I am not sure it will really help physicians.
The statistics on law suits is really not that staggering. Despite reports to the contrary Americans are not eager to sue
doctors. Again, the reports are overblown compared to the reality of the lawsuits.
Sue A 11/18/09 7:11
Frank - Sounds like an urban myth to me. Please document for us ten convincing examples of very stupid people being awarded ridiculous sums of money...
Phony Solution 11/17/09 11:03
Congress is full of lawyers, lawyers get big bucks from lawsuits. Congress has gotten to the point that they feel there is no need to respond to their constituents. This is a problem in both parties, Democrat and Republican. If enough of these old scoundrels were thrown out by the voters, maybe the others would have better hearing.
Jerry Stroud 11/17/09 1:40
I really don't think anyone believes that TORT reform 'alone' would reduce costs to the point they need to be, but it could make a dent along with other suggestions that have been made. However,as long as Congress remains lopsided and no one even tries to work together we will continue to get the form letter responses from our Representatives. When one Party is in such a majority there's no reason to listen to or answer the opposing side. You take it or leave it. It happened when the other party was in control and it happens again. Voters need to be much more diligent about who they are voting for instead of just pulling the leaver or punching the button for one Party. This country functions best when there is a more balanced representation. Those who chose to elect 'change we can believe in' are definitely seeing change but is it really something we can all believe in?
rdr 11/17/09 12:27
"Law suit settlements do two things."

Actually they can do three things, sometimes awarding ridiculous sums of money to some very stupid people.....

Frank Pierce 11/17/09 10:53
You know, there ARE limits on law suits. They are regulated by juries or judges who hear the circumstances argued from both sides within our judicial system. This idea that tort reform is going to fix the out-of-control healthcare costs is premised on the idea that there are all those people out there taking advantage of insurance companies. How are you going to feel when YOUR loved one is disabled, made into a vegetable, or dies due to negligence in the (very lucrative) medical industry?
Law suit settlements do two things. Not only do they give some sort of compensation for loss, they also give a very strong incentive to the members of the industry to be more careful in their behavior.

I don't see "tort reform" as a positive solution to anything.

Phony Solution 11/17/09 8:33

POLL

Which one of the following best describes you?

Show results

Volunteer Pay

Support your community newspaper by making a voluntary donation to assist our Internet efforts.

Coupons

Now on thedailyreview.com, print coupons and SAVE!

m.thedailyreview.com

Now you can access thedailyreview.com on your favorite mobile device.

King Features

Get your daily dose of Comics, Horoscopes and Puzzles from thedailyreview.com

NIE MAJOR SPONSOR

Thanks to Chesapeake Energy for helping to develop our future readers, writers and thinkers by providing newspapers for area classrooms through The Review's Newspaper in Education Program.

Thank you

to our Associate Sponsors for supporting the NIE program.

USA Weekend

USA Weekend Weekly teachers guides, special reports and much more.

Showcase of Fine Homes

Search and find your new home in The Daily Review's weekly advertising supplement, Showcase of Fine Homes.

Local jury awards plaintiffs more than $700K against area doctor in lawsuit

A Bradford County jury found against a Towanda physician recently in a civil lawsuit, awarding the plaintiffs $724,932. According to information filed in the Bradford County Prothonotary's office, on March 8, following a trial, the jury found in favor of


 

PennDOT gets tough on gas companies

TOWANDA - The state Department of Transportation is hiring three more inspectors for Bradford County to address the damage on state roads caused by heavy truck traffic and has warned gas drilling companies this week that they will need to deploy all reso