mobile site Go to The Daily Review mobile

Letters to the Editor 11/10


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

Not true

EDITOR: This is in regards to the article printed in The Sunday Review.

I was shocked and upset when I heard what was printed "That the oil guys don't tip as well as the locals."

When I was questioned on the tips and comparison my comment was: "No I'm not going there: because tips are a privilege and truly no one else's business in my opinion."

These guys have become local family to us. We know them all by name (that's 100-plus names). We not only appreciate their business but their kindness.

They're good guys that work long hours and long weeks yet still come in with a smile and laughter. But no matter who you are, anyone entering the restaurant is treated equally.

I apologize to each and every one of you that may think, feel, or believe that I had said you don't tip well, but I never said that, I'm hurt by this too! Because that's not true.

Christy Bartholomew

Franklindale

Stay with us

EDITOR: This Wednesday (Nov. 11) is Veteran's Day. In our church service this morning, our pastor had all veterans stand to be recognized by the congregation. He also prayed for the victims and families whose lives are forever changed by the Fort Hood tragedy. The congregation then stood and sang "My Country, Tis of Thee." When we got to the last part of the last verse... "Long may our land be bright With freedom's holy light; Protect us by Thy might, Great God, our King!" I was overcome! And I poured out my grief by praying "Almighty God...we have really screwed up this nation that You chartered. Look at what the evil people in Washington are doing to our beloved nation! Please do not turn your face away from us."

Geo Houser

Burlington

Something to remember

EDITOR: President Obama recently approved a two percent salary increase, effective Jan. 1, 2010. Members of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches are also due for an automatic pay increase in January.

But for the first time in history, the Congress will not allow an increase in the Social Security COLA (cost of Living Adjustment). Not only no COLA, but the medicare insurance premium will go up.

Remember this next year when you vote for all the incumbent senators and congressmen and in 2012. Show them what you think of them for not thinking of you.

John Tomaszewicz

Monroeton

Historic accomplishment

EDITOR: On Saturday, Nov. 7, a bipartisan majority of the House of Representatives made history by passing H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act.

After nearly a century of attempts and failures, this was the first time a chamber of Congress has ever passed comprehensive health insurance reform. This is certainly a historic accomplishment.

All of the representatives who voted for this bill deserve thanks for resisting tremendous pressure from the insurance industry lobbyists and standing up for their constituents.

It is hoped that those who voted against this bill will reconsider and show the courage it takes to do hard things, and vote for it when the bill comes up for the final vote in the house.

A vote for this bill was a vote to provide secure and stable coverage for Americans with insurance, expand coverage for those who do not have insurance, lower costs for families and businesses, and begin to reduce the deficit.

Jan Cooper

Troy

We need this

EDITOR: It was with some considerable pride that I watched The House of Representatives make strides toward providing health care for the people of America.

Having grown up in Scotland I never knew the worry of paying for my health care or prescriptions. To this day if I am visiting family back home and need to see a doctor or pick up some medicine I can.

As a single mother of three children and working three jobs -none of which provide health care, I now do understand the challenges of basic health care in America.

I am responsible for paying for my own insurance and have had to argue for such basic coverage as seeing the doctor when I had the flu.

I want this to be a country I believe in and a country that believes in its people.

The passing of comprehensive health care insurance reform and the continued passage of the Affordable Health Care for America Act is crucial to the lives of so many American families - and mine.

Melanie Pollard

Sayre

Spin to the left

EDITOR: The massive Democrat health bill which puts a sixth of the American economy under government control passed late Saturday night by two votes. One of those votes was the newly elected Representative Owens from New York, who vowed in the campaign to vote against it. The other was Chris Carney.

Since his election, Representative Carney has voted with his constituents, but always in issues where his vote didn't make any difference. When push comes to shove, when every vote matters, Carney voted with Pelosi.

Next November remember, no matter how hard Carney tries to spin himself back to the middle, that a vote for him in the next election is a vote for the left wing of the Democrat party when it counts.

Duane Campbell

Towanda

On the other hand...

EDITOR: We are fortunate to have a representative from our district who showed nothing short of heroism by voting for H.R. 3962. While attempts were made in the past to reform unfair practices by insurers and make health care more affordable to all, Chris Carney was one who helped make this dream a reality. He courageously said YES, despite tremendous pressures to do otherwise. This is truly an historic moment. Thank You representative Carney, for standing up for us. It is my belief that this bill will not only lower costs for families and businesses, but will cover more people who couldn't afford it before.

Barbara Pulver

Troy







Type in the characters you see in the picture below. If you have trouble reading the characters in the picture, click it to see a new one.



31 posted comments

Jacob, you are so right. The majority, (estimates range form 54 to 65% of citizens) want a strong health care bill. A strong public option is wise, and the correct means, to achieve this goal.
The idea is options. Whether private or government sponsored, all citizens would have options. Also, there would be security, which individuals do not currently have. One can be dropped for almost any reason, even tho all premiums have been paid, in full and on time. I have read stories of individuals losing coverage for not reporting a childhood illness or minor injuries. Under the bills proposed in both the House and Senate, this would no longer be allowed. Exorbitant premiums for those deemed high risk are the norm. A cancer survivor either can not obtain insurance, or is asked to pay $1000 or more,per month. (Who can afford that?)
Caps, lifetime limits, excessive co-pays, are punitive. Requiring excessive enrollment periods before maternity benefits start, is dangerous, but common. For too long we have allowed the insurance industry to dictate what care we are entitled to. If we have lost freedom, it has come at the hands of the insurance industry. I do believe Affordable Health Care is essential to the survival of our economy. We are far from solvent at present, we have been pulled from the brink of collapse, but there is a long road ahead to economic recovery. A large factor in that will be containing the cost of health care. Altho, about 16% of our tax dollars are spent on health care, as opposed to about 10% in Canada or the UK, we have much worse outcomes, and we do not cover all citizens. No one has lost freedoms due to Medicare, Medicaid, or the V.A. Many have gained peace of mind, and protection from financial ruin, because of these programs. We should not deny others what we offer our politicians, government employees, or the members of the military, which is medical coverage, regardless of ability to pay or the level of care required. America is generous, and should extend that good will to those who need it so very much. I am speaking of the approximately 47 Million uninsured Citizens.
For the life of me, I do not understand how one equates having access to health care, with loss of freedom. It would seem to me that fear of financial ruin, or loss of life, would inhibit ones' freedom far more.
If you own a car, insurance is forced upon you. Not having insurance may result in loss of driving privileges, fines, and possibly jail. Yet, I never hear anyone protesting this being forced on them. No one says, "hey that uninsured guy, was just exercising his personal freedom, when he wrecked my car." Because that makes no sense. Insuring all Americans, so they may seek affordable health care, is the sensible solution.
I am pleased and proud of Chris Carney. Just as standing up to Don Sherwood was right. Voting for the Health Care bill was right.
Thank you Chris Carney.
Let us all work together to make this a more perfect union, and ensure the welfare of our citizens, as stated in the preamble to the Constitution.
Sue A 11/12/09 9:28
No where in the Constitution do I find anything giving the President and Congress the right to force insurance upon the people.
Amendment X of the Contitution says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution,nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People."
Yes we are rebuilding our reputation around the world to one of weakness and appeasement. We are changing words so as to diminish their intent or effect. I love America too and we are the most generous nation in the world. I want us to remain a finiancially solvent nation and I want us to remain FREE!
Independence 11/12/09 2:49
Sue A., Chris Carney was voted into office because for many Republicans the alternative was unthinkable. Don Sherwood was an embarrassment and he should have withdrawn. So far, I think Rep. Carney has represented his constituents well. The majority of voters in both parties want affordable health care for all Americans. There are a few who do not, as evidenced by responses here, for a variety of reasons. I maintain that the economy cannot recover until the health care bill is passed. The stronger the bill, the quicker the economy comes back and the stronger the recovery will be. It will be nearly impossible to ever return to a manufacturing based economy like the one that made us so strong. A health care bill with a strong public option will make the health care sector of the economy strong and that's a good place to start.
Jacob L. 11/12/09 12:41
We can not surrender to the money, or the lobbyists, we must fight on for what is right. Knowing we may not prevail, but also knowing that our message must be heard. It is time we, as a people, as a nation, find our moral compass. Just as people should be judged by the content of their character, and not the content of their wallet.So,shall nations. Right now, we are slowly rebuilding our reputation around the world. One means by which we will be judged is how we treat our own citizens. Providing the promise of Affordable Healh Care for all Americans is one of the ways we show we do care about all our citizens.
I was taught in Sunday school, and in my home growing up, and have tried to impress upon my own children and grandchildren, that it is the manner in which you treat the least of our fellow humans, which forms the basis of your character. I love the USA. I do believe fully in the promise of America. I just want it to do better. I applaud the representatives who voted yes, and I especially want to thank Chris Carney for doing the right thing.
In the end, that is all we are asking, just do the right thing.
Thank you.
Sue A 11/12/09 7:51
Sue, I am sorry - my last sentence should have read "the money controls the GOP and the money will call the shots."
follow the money 11/12/09 7:50
Ah...the Republicans, who did next to nothing to fix what clearly is a crisis...now scuttling like sand crabs, jumping up and down like mad birds on a wire...telling us why the sky is about to fall (as opposed to why it's already falling with denied benefits, preposterous filing systems, huge premiums, labor disputes over contracts due to health insurance, etc. etc.)...sadly, in a time where anyone SHOULD vote their own conscience and do what they perceive to be right, the Democrats HAVE to stick together because they know the Republicans will too, and nothing will get done. More gridlock. More expense to the people. But it's bizarre to think that voting for change is somehow more evil than once again going belly up and doing NOTHING. I applaud Chris Carney...he's a good man and a good representative and he won in this area in spite of being a Democrat. The only stooges are the ones that buy into all the crap that comes out of the entertainer clowns they're watching on TV and talk radio. Who are making millions out of their bile...
Independent 11/12/09 6:35
Sue; The GOP has always been the party of big business. There are few businesses bigger than health care. There isn't money available for politicians from the health care industry, or not much anyway. The money comes from the insurance industry, which spends more than three million dollars a day on lobbying and advertising. Politicians who can't raise money, and lots of it, cannot compete come election time. So they will take the money because without it they are out of a job. Once they accept the money they're committed to support the cause that gave them the money. If they don't, the money stops. If you want to be blunt, call it a bribe. That's what it is. You and I both worked in health care and we both know the score. Most politicians don't care one whit about the quality of patient care, or whether it is available or not or who is denied it, or who loses their house because of medical bills. If they did they'd lose the money they need to keep their jobs. The system sucks, but it's the best we've got. Some brave representatives took a big leap of faith and voted for a health care bill that wasn't much but was all they were offered. With the smaller number of Senators the money can be spread a lot thicker over fewer people. Don't expect as easy a time with the Senate as there was with the house. The democrats might control the Senate, but the GOP controls the money and the money will call the shots.
follow the money 11/11/09 5:50
I stand with Senator Grayson, the G.O.P. has a plan. The status quo.
They continue to get rich from insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies, and the citizens suffer. As Senator Grayson said, the G.O.P. plan seems to be, "Don't get sick, and if you do get sick, please die quickly."
Don't be fooled by the fear. If we do nothing, we will lose economically and morally. How we care for the least of our citizens, is how we will be measured as a nation. What is the character of the U.S.A.
Where is the Christian principle of loving thy neighbor, as thyself, in the G.O.P. debate?
This has been debated for over 70 years, and the American Citizen is treated worse every passing year.
We can not lose this opportunity to act.
Affordable healthcare for all.
The time is now.
Sue A 11/11/09 3:43
Sue-Why hasn't fraud been reduced now? Did you read Brian Riedl's op-ed "Spenders ignore deepening waste?" Don't delude yourself thinging altruism is the basis for providing health care when Washington spends millons to enhance Kennedy's legacy in Massachusetts,the govt. now owns car companies, banks and now it knows what is best for all of us in the healthcare arena. I have listened to the legislators who are physicians and I don't hear any of them endorsing the government option. Carney should have voted against this bill and both sides should incorporate good points into a new bill. Hopefully the senate will stop this runaway freight train. Insure those without insurance but don't dismantle a system working for 80% of the population. Fix what needs fixing-don't create another crisis.
Independence 11/11/09 2:06
I did not mean we need to get rid of insurance companies. But we need to revamp their business model. Right now they make their profits (obscene) by increasing premiums and reducing coverage or denying payment. That's a recipe for just the disaster we now face. Imagine you were the only company in the state making 'widgets' - a product everyone needs. Without competition, you can jack up your selling price and reduce quality to increase your profit margin. That is exactly what health insurance companies do. Start by capping CEO compensation at three million dollars a year. That's a nasty pay cut for many of them but give them an incentive to earn more. On top of their salary they could earn bonuses for improving delivery of services and lowering of premiums. Make them work toward overhead costs comparable to Medicare - two percent or less. Make it the goal of adjusters and clerks to see that reimbursement is made to health care providers quickly and efficiently. Get them out of the mind-set that success is equated with NOT paying claims.
change the model 11/11/09 1:31
I stand with Senator Grayson, the G.O.P. has a plan. The status quo.
They continue to get rich from insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies, and the citizens suffer. As Senator Grayson said, the G.O.P. plan seems to be, "Don't get sick, and if you do get sick, please die quickly."
Don't be fooled by the fear. If we do nothing, we will lose economically and morally. How we care for the least of our citizens, is how we will be measured as a nation. What is the character of the U.S.A.
Where is the Christian principle of loving thy neighbor, as thyself, in the G.O.P. debate?
This has been debated for over 70 years, and the American Citizen is treated worse every passing year.
We can not lose this opportunity to act.
Affordable healthcare for all.
The time is now.
Sue A 11/11/09 11:00
For those who worry so about cost. Currently, we spend more than any other nation ON THE EARTH for health care Yet have worse outcomes We are ranked 37th in the world. Still, 16% of our federal dollars goes to health care. The GAO has reported that this bill will be deficit neutral for the first 10 years, and then will reduce costs. This will be done via reduced fraud, regulation of the insurance industries run away profits, and preventive care. Preventive care is vital, because if people do not become seriously ill, the cost to care for them goes down.
This bill will improve, not harm, the Medicare prescription plan.
This bill will ensure that every woman will receive pre-natal care, a must, if we are to improve our infant mortality rate. (29th in the world). Oh, this bill does alot to reduce costs.
Reducing costs, and improving outcomes, what a great idea.
No one has stated they want to eliminate insurance companies, however, stopping the abuse by these companies should be a goal we all agree on. If someone pays all their premiums, and then becomes ill or suffers a serious injury, they should not lose coverage. Nor should someone be denied insurance due to pre-existing conditions. Which the insurance companies stretch to the max. Reports of young, healthy adults being denied benefits due to a pre-existing condition such as strep throat in elementary school, or chicken pox, or a bike accident in the first grade. Paying bonuses to those whose entire job is based on not paying legitimate claims by finding some questionable grounds, must stop. I do not know why those who worry about our freedom, and not upset with the insurance industry. The insurance industry, truly, does have its own "death panels." If you get sick, and lose your insurance, the answer is often to die, because the cost of care is beyond measure.
Stopping these bad practices is wise, and we all need to support it.
One more time, if you are happy with your current insurance you will have the option to keep it. If you lose your job, or are denied coverage, you will have options for insurance not currently available. If you are poor, you will be eligible for subsidized insurance..like state medicaid, etc. The public option is for those who can not find affordable private coverage. It will be self-sustaining, and collect premiums, just as the current insurance companies do. However, the public option will be Non-profit.
The insurance companies stand to gain millions of new customers.
That can not hurt them, and when a company gets more business, it rarely lays-off the employees.
I did listen to the debates, even when it got down right silly, such as using a 7 month old as a prop. I read the bill.
I support Affordable Health Care for All. Unless you are a multi-millionaire, you should, as well.
Sue A 11/11/09 10:55
I, too, commend and thank, Rep. Chris Carney for standing with us.
His yes vote made me, and the majority of our citizens proud. Now, we must impress the Senate with our strong will, and desire, for Affordable Health Care for all citizens. Sit down and write a letter, or call your Senator, and tell him we want a YES vote.
Altho, the insurance lobbyists, and the G.O.P. will try to stop it, the momentum is there. The Time is Now. Affordable Health Care for All. We must act now.
Sue A. 11/11/09 10:38
To GOP: Eliminating health insurance companies isn't the answer. Our govt. wastes so much money what makes you think they can run another massive undertaking? (Freddie Mac, Post office, etc.aren't exactly shining examples of their management skills) Oversee the insurance companies, push for portability of insurance,eliminate pre-existing clauses,make it possible to purchase insurance across state lines. As far as I know, insurance companies employee thousands of people. When would you like them to be shut out of the healthcare business? And when these people are unemployed do you think the country will be better off? Correct things one at a time. We don't need any more crises!
Independence 11/11/09 1:00
Did anyone listen to the debates on C-span prior to the House voting for the healthcare bill? If so, one cannot say that this bill will lower costs for families, businesses etc. The cost is unsustainable, put together by people who know nothing about health care and really don't care. All it is about is power and control.
They are creating more bureaucratic departments while the populous has massive unemployment upward of 10.5%. Don't be naive.
Nothing is free in life. And when there is an exclusion of input from the Republican party no one can say there is bipartisanship.
We should retain what works and start fixing several things that don't. What we have now is a mishmosh of legal jargon so convoluted as to discourage one from reading any of it at all.
Independence 11/11/09 12:38
Geo Houser - taking a chance that you read the online Review, what exactly do you mean by "Look at what the evil people in Washington are doing to our beloved nation!"?
BC Native 11/10/09 9:36
A medical savings program of two or three thousand dollars to cover routine medical expenses, unspent portions to be retained by the account holder tax free, to bring market forces to bear on health costs. Let the health consumer decide whether he wants the three hundred dollar a month pill or the just as good 30 dollar a month pill, the 200 dollar a visit doctor or the 50 dollar a visit doctor, an MRI "just to be sure" or not, an office visit for the common cold. Watch prices stabilize. Then a catastrophic cost insurance plan, much, much cheaper than a full spectrum plan. In both cases, they can be subsidized on a sliding scale for those who need it. That would put the health consumer in control. Dems don't want that.
Duane Campbell 11/10/09 7:22
Single Payor: Oh Please, spare me the propoganda that only the Democrats have a plan for health care reform. There have been plans proposed by the other side of the isle, but they have not been allowed to see the light of day by Pelosi and company.

They define bi-partisanship as "agree with what we want and shut up". In fairness this is a trait not limited to one party. There are good ideas on both sides about reforming, not replacing, the health care industry without bankrupting the country.

What amazes me is that people of intelligence such as yourself actually believe the ideological drivel and "magic" math espoused by liberal democrats. Just because you want a worthy goal so bad doesn't mean you should support a flawed effort to obtain it. Health care reform can be obtained, but only through a true bipartisan effort not one that is a thinly veiled sham for socialist engineering.

By the way there is a risk in making assumptions such as you did in your statements. They are not "my Republican leaders". I am one those Independents who is unhappy with the workings of both parties.

PatrickHenry 11/10/09 3:23
65 and holding - how has the cost of living gone down??? I don't see it.
Reader 11/10/09 3:19
For Jim Andrews, PatrickHenry, and Duane Campbell: Lots of negatives. What is YOUR plan? How would you solve this mess? Assuming you agree that the present system is unsustainable, just how would you solve this problem? Those of us who have listened to your negativity for so long would like to know. Your Republican leaders would like to know. Right now they appear to know nothing.
single payor 11/10/09 1:15

POLL

Which one of the following best describes you?

Show results

Volunteer Pay

Support your community newspaper by making a voluntary donation to assist our Internet efforts.

Coupons

Now on thedailyreview.com, print coupons and SAVE!

m.thedailyreview.com

Now you can access thedailyreview.com on your favorite mobile device.

King Features

Get your daily dose of Comics, Horoscopes and Puzzles from thedailyreview.com

NIE MAJOR SPONSOR

Thanks to Chesapeake Energy for helping to develop our future readers, writers and thinkers by providing newspapers for area classrooms through The Review's Newspaper in Education Program.

Thank you

to our Associate Sponsors for supporting the NIE program.

USA Weekend

USA Weekend Weekly teachers guides, special reports and much more.

Showcase of Fine Homes

Search and find your new home in The Daily Review's weekly advertising supplement, Showcase of Fine Homes.

Local jury awards plaintiffs more than $700K against area doctor in lawsuit

A Bradford County jury found against a Towanda physician recently in a civil lawsuit, awarding the plaintiffs $724,932. According to information filed in the Bradford County Prothonotary's office, on March 8, following a trial, the jury found in favor of


 

PennDOT gets tough on gas companies

TOWANDA - The state Department of Transportation is hiring three more inspectors for Bradford County to address the damage on state roads caused by heavy truck traffic and has warned gas drilling companies this week that they will need to deploy all reso