Go to The Daily Review mobile
Transparency of casino gambling falls short in Pa.
Font size: [A] [A] [A]
e-mail this
share thisState lawmakers and regulators consistently have fallen short of their long-ago promise to make casino gambling in Pennsylvania completely transparent.
State regulation has been marked by internecine warfare between state agencies, after-the-fact revelations about license awards, a revolving door for regulatory personnel moving into the industry, and so on.
Just this week Pittsburgh newspapers reported that a statewide investigative grand jury is looking at as-yet undisclosed casino licensing issues.
And a group purporting to represent several large casinos threatened to sue the state government if the Gaming Control Board issued new slots licenses to expand the number of machines at small casinos.
The group, the Pennsylvania Casino Association, ran a series of radio ads, issued public statements and sent letters to state officials regarding its position on impending legislation, yet is not registered as a lobbying organization. It initially claimed to represent four casinos and then shortened the list to three. One of those three, Mount Airy Casino Resort in Monroe County, later notified state regulators and lawmakers that it would not participate in any litigation launched by the association.
The association's activities drew particular attention because former Chief Justice of Pennsylvania Stephen A. Zappala has been a board officer and executive director of the group.
Rep. Dante Santoni Jr., chairman of the state House Gaming Oversight Committee, said this week that he wants to know why the association is not registered as a lobbyist while engaging in lobby-like activities.
Mr. Santoni should conduct hearings to examine that issue. If the state government ever is to achieve the transparency about gambling that it has promised, that transparency must include casino-related lobbying.
1 posted comments